Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact us Login 
  • Users Online:727
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 66-71

Prevalence of diabetes and hypertension among a tribal population in Tamil Nadu


1 Department of Community Medicine, Vinayaka Missions Kirupananda Variyar Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Pharmacology, Vinayaka Missions Kirupananda Variyar Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Web Publication13-Apr-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Shankar Radhakrishnan
Department of Community Medicine, Vinayaka Missions Kirupananda Variyar Medical College, Chinna Seeragapadi, Salem - 636 308, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2321-4848.154948

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Diabetes and hypertension is affecting at an alarming rate in both rural and urban populations in India and very few studies had been carried out among the tribal population. Objective: To determine the prevalence rate of type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension and its associated risk factors among the tribal population in Salem District in Tamil Nadu. Materials and Methods: A total of about 525 tribal population above 40 years of age from various tribal places in Yercaud. All of them were screened for diabetes, by checking the random blood glucose levels and blood pressure, body mass index, dietary patterns, and physical activity levels were also recorded. Their knowledge about diabetes was also assessed by a set of 10 questions. Results: Among the study population, people who had RBS ΃ 200 was 28 (male = 11 and female = 17) and between 140 and 200 were 39 (male = 18 and female = 21) and people whose were in the prehypertensive stage was 185 (males 92 and female 93) and people in the stage 1 hypertension was 102 (male = 47 and female = 54) and in stage 2 hypertension was 64 (male = 33 and female = 29). The co-morbidity (diabetes and hypertension) was present in among 45 (male = 25 and female = 20). Among the study population only 1 was obese and 39 were overweight. Among the various risk factors smoking, alcohol and positive family history were found to have a statistical significant association for males whereas among females only the family history was found to have a statistically significant association for both diabetes and hypertension. The knowledge of diabetes among the study population was very poor. None of them were aware about the normal levels of blood sugar and the risk factors. Conclusion: The study documented that the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension is increasingly high in the tribal areas and their awareness levels were very poor.

Keywords: Diabetes, hypertension, prevalence, tribal


How to cite this article:
Radhakrishnan S, Ekambaram M. Prevalence of diabetes and hypertension among a tribal population in Tamil Nadu. Arch Med Health Sci 2015;3:66-71

How to cite this URL:
Radhakrishnan S, Ekambaram M. Prevalence of diabetes and hypertension among a tribal population in Tamil Nadu. Arch Med Health Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Jan 19];3:66-71. Available from: http://www.amhsjournal.org/text.asp?2015/3/1/66/154948


  Introduction Top


In spite of incredible progress in the field of medicine, curative and preventive health measures, there is still a huge number of population living in isolation in natural and unpolluted surroundings far away from civilization with their traditional values, customs, beliefs and myths intact. They are commonly known as "tribals" and are considered to be the autochthonous people of the land. About half of the world's autochthonous people, comprising 635 tribal communities including 75 primitive tribal communities live in India. The tribal community makes up about 7% of India's population. [1] They thus constitute a substantial portion of our population. Yet, they are ignored by our policy makers.

Today, the uncontrolled way of life is the root cause of all sorts of miseries and many ill-fated diseases to mankind. [2] Diabetes mellitus, a predictable and preventable metabolic disorder is becoming a global epidemic. It is predicted that the diabetes incidence will be doubled in most nations within 20 years and 19% world's diabetic cases are Indians. The etiologies of both these diseases are multi-factorial in nature. Hypertension and diabetes are important risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Given the increasing rates of coronary artery disease among Indians, especially at a younger age, understanding and successfully managing hypertension and diabetes may hold the key to reduce cardiovascular mortality in India. [3] Diabetes and hypertension are also known to coexist in patients. The prevalence of hypertension is 1.5-2.0 times more in those with diabetes than in those without diabetes, whereas almost one-third of the patients with hypertension develop diabetes later. This coexistence presents an increased risk and can accelerate vascular complications. Diabetes and hypertension are manageable health conditions and can be controlled by medicinal interventions, exercises, and balanced diet.

Moreover, detection of progenitors - prediabetes and prehypertension - through periodic surveillance can allow for early intervention and delay disease progression. Studies on diabetes prevalence had shown that around 6-12% in urban and 2-3% in rural Indian populations [4] is diabetic. An accelerated increase of diabetes is also noticed in tribal (or) aboriginal populations worldwide, but very few studies had been done in hilly tribes of India. Hence, this study was carried out to assess the prevalence and the risk factors of diabetes and hypertension in a tribal area in Tamil Nadu.


  Materials and Methods Top


Yercaud is a hill station located from about 25 km from Salem. In Yercaud, there are about 25 tribal villages. Vinayaka Mission Medical College Hospital conducts a routine general camp in Kombuthuki on every Wednesdays. Keeping the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes as 30% and the maximum allowable error as 12% we calculated the sample size, which came to around 425 and to still more improve the validity we added another 100 to the sample and the total study population was made to 525. All the study samples were recruited from the nearby villages namely Vazhavandhi, Kombuthuki, Koravankadu and Mamalaburam by applying a simple random technique for the people aged 40 years and above. Among them, 306 were females and 219 were males. All of them were screened for diabetes, by random blood glucose levels. Along with random blood sugar (RBS), their blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), dietary patterns and physical activity levels were also recorded. Their knowledge about diabetes was also assessed by a set of 10 questions. Based on RBS, the cut-off values were fixed as sugar level ≥200 are considered as diabetic and sugar levels between 140 and 200 are considered to be prediabetic and sugar level <140 is normal. Hypertension was categorized based on JNC seven classification. [5]


  Results Top


[Table 1] shows the distribution of the study population based on the age and gender. Of the total 525 study population, 306 were females and 219 are males. Majority of them were in the age group of between 30 and 60 years. [Table 2] shows the distribution of the study population based on their RBS levels. It is seen from the table that about 18 (8.2%) males and 21 (6.8%) females are in the stage of prediabetic and 11 (5%) males and 17 (5.5%) females were diagnosed as diabetes. Majority of prediabetics (RBS between 140 and 200) and diabetics (RBS >200) were in the age group between 40 and 60 years.
Table 1: Age and sex wise distribution of the study population


Click here to view
Table 2: Distribution of RBS values among the study population


Click here to view


[Table 3] shows the classification of hypertension among the study population. It is seen from the table that about 42% males and 30% females were in the stage of prehypertension and around 36% males and 26% females are diagnosed as hypertensives. Similar to the diabetic prevalence hypertension also found to be more prevalent among the age group between 40 and 60 years and [Table 4] shows that 11.4% males and 6.5% females had both diabetes and hypertension.
Table 3: Classification of hypertension among the study population


Click here to view
Table 4: Prevalence of co-morbidity (diabetes and hypertension) among the study population


Click here to view


[Table 5] shows the various risk factors for diabetes among the study population and from the table it is seen that for males smoking, alcohol consumption and family history of diabetes were found to have statistically significant association for diabetes were as in females the family history of diabetes alone had a statistically significant association and from [Table 6] among the various risk factors for hypertension in males smoking and family history of hypertension was found to have a statistically significant association for developing hypertension and among females the positive family history alone was found to have a statistically significant association.
Table 5: Risk factors for diabetes among the study population


Click here to view
Table 6: Risk factors for hypertension among the study population


Click here to view


[Table 5] and [Table 6] show that BMI did not had a statistically significant association for both diabetes and hypertension, whereas most of the studies done in urban and rural areas had shown BMI as a very strong predictor in developing diabetes and hypertension.

The awareness level about diabetes was assessed by a set of 10 questions and that was administered to all the patients and none of them were able to answer any of the questions and the awareness level was almost 0%.


  Discussion Top


The prevalence of diabetes among different sexes is a controversial one. Many earlier studies reveal the male sex specific [6],[7],[8] female sex specific [9],[10] and sex nonspecific [11] prevalence of diabetes. Female sex specific (1.6% in females and 0.8% in males) prevalence of diabetes has been noticed in a recent study done by Murugan and Beula [3] in the tribal areas of Kanyakumari and a study by Sachdev B [12] among the tribal population, showed that the prevalence was 9.8% and 12.5%, respectively with higher prevalence among female population when compared with male population, whereas in this study the prevalence of diabetes was 5 and 5.5% among males and females respectively, which had shown there was no gender specificity among the diabetes prevalence.

Several studies are in support of age - specific onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). [13],[14] The minimum and the maximum age of the diabetic subjects are 51 and 88 years respectively and in our study most of the diabetics were in the age group of between 40 and 60 years, which was in par with the previous studies.

Obesity (or) weight gain is a major risk factor for T2DM. The relationship between BMI and diabetes mellitus is reported by many researchers, [15],[16] whereas in our study, obesity was not a factor to be associated with diabetes and most of our study population were having normal BMI and some were even undernourished. The reason for this was their food habits and the physical activity. Most of them usually have only two meals per day and they walk about 5-7 km/day.

The impacts of alcohol and smoking on diabetes have been discussed by many studies [17],[18] and it was found to be same in our study particularly among males. Family history of diabetes [19] was found to be a strong factor in both males and females among the various other factors, which influences the prevalence of diabetes and the findings is in par with various other studies.

A study carried out by Kokiwar and Gupta [20] using the JNC seven criteria for assessment of hypertension among the age group 30 years and above found the prevalence of hypertension was 19.04% in the rural population of central India. The prevalence of hypertension in rural areas of Tamil Nadu in the age group of 45-60 years was 33%. [21] Although Gupta et al. [22] reported a prevalence of 24% in males and 17% in females in the age group of 20 years and above from rural Rajasthan. Gilberts et al. [23] carried out a study in rural Tamil Nadu in the age group of 20 years and above and found a prevalence of 12.5%, whereas in our study about 42% males and 30% females were in the stage of prehypertension and 36% males and 26% females are hypertensives. The prevalence of population having both diabetes and hypertension as a co-morbid disease was 11.5% in males and 6.5% among females.

Prevalence of hypertension was significantly higher in males than females. Similar findings were reported by Gupta et al. [22] and Dong et al. [24] but Hazarika et al.[25] and Malhotra et al. [26] showed increased prevalence in females when compared with males. All the studies agree with the fact that prevalence of hypertension increased with age [21],[24] which is in par with this study. Age probably represents an accumulation of environmental influences and the effect of genetically programmed senescence in body systems. [27]

A study done by Bansal et al. [28] had shown that both males and females, age and high BMI were significant predictors of hypertension and similar results were also quoted by Gupta et al. [29] whereas in our study smoking was the only modifiable risk factor, which had shown significant association with hypertension and the family history of hypertension, which was a nonmodifiable risk factor had also shown a statistical significant association for hypertension in both males and females.


  Conclusion Top


The two giant chronic morbidities diabetes and hypertension now a pandemic is a new challenge to the modern world. The prevalence usually vary from nation-to-nation, area to area, people to people and even in the same group people. The heterogeneous (or) differential prevalence among people is decided by their socioeconomic, cultural, and topographical conditions. A low level of prevalence of T2DM in the present tribe may be due to their lifestyle changes and genetic constitution, whereas the prevalence of hypertension did not show much difference when compared with urban or rural population. Further studies are required to assess the prevalence, determinants and preventive interventions for diabetes and hypertension in tribal areas. There is a need for strengthening health education programs to promote chronic diseases awareness and emphasize preventive measures among this helpless tribal population.

 
  References Top

1.
Bhasin V. Medical Anthropology: Tribals of Rajasthan. Delhi: Kamla-Raj Enterprises; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sachdev B. Prevalence of hypertension and associated risk factors among Nomad Tribe groups. Antrocom Online J Anthropol 2011;7:181-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Murugan A, Beula. Epidemiological studies on type-2 diabetes mellitus in Kaani tribes of Kanyakumari district, Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Res Rev Pharm Appl Sci 2012;2:651-61.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1047-53.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003;289:2560-72.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Chow CK, Raju PK, Raju R, Reddy KS, Cardona M, Celermajer DS, et al. The prevalence and management of diabetes in rural India. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1717-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Gatling W, Budd S, Walters D, Mullee MA, Goddard JR, Hill RD. Evidence of an increasing prevalence of diagnosed diabetes mellitus in the Poole area from 1983 to 1996. Diabet Med 1998;15:1015-21.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Jerlin NF, Murugan A. Incidence of Type-2 diabetes in an agrarian community in the southern most parts of India. Aus J Basic Appl Sci 2011;5:417-23.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Dharmaraj D, Viswanathan M. Prevalence of glucose intolerance in Asian Indians. Urban-rural difference and significance of upper body adiposity. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1348-55.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Raman Kutty V, Joseph A, Soman CR. High prevalence of type 2 diabetes in an urban settlement in Kerala, India. Ethn Health 1999;4:231-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Kapur A, Vijay V, Mohan V, Das AK, et al. High prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in India: National Urban Diabetes Survey. Diabetologia 2001;44:1094-101.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sachdev B. Screening of Type 2 diabetes mellitus and its associated risk factors among select tribes of Rajasthan. Int J Health Sci Res 2012;2:33-44.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Burrows NR, Geiss LS, Engelgau MM, Acton KJ. Prevalence of diabetes among Native Americans and Alaska Natives, 1990-1997: An increasing burden. Diabetes Care 2000; 23:1786-90.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Schraer CD, Adler AI, Mayer AM, Halderson KR, Trimble BA. Diabetes complications and mortality among Alaska Natives: 8 years of observation. Diabetes Care 1997;20:314-21.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Hartz AJ, Rupley DC Jr, Kalkhoff RD, Rimm AA. Relationship of obesity to diabetes: Influence of obesity level and body fat distribution. Prev Med 1983;12:351-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.
Holbrook TL, Barrett-Connor E, Wingard DL. The association of lifetime weight and weight control patterns with diabetes among men and women in an adult community. Int J Obes 1989;13:723-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Barnard ND, Cohen J, Jenkins DJ, Turner-McGrievy G, Gloede L, Jaster B, et al. A low-fat vegan diet improves glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in a randomized clinical trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1777-83.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Robbins JM, Vaccarino V, Zhang H, Kasl SV. Socioeconomic status and type 2 diabetes in African American and non-Hispanic white women and men: Evidence from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Public Health 2001;91:76-83.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Joshi SR, Saboo B, Vadivale M, Dani SI, Mithal A, Kaul U, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes and hypertension in India - Results from the Screening India's Twin Epidemic (SITE) study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14:8-15.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Kokiwar PR, Gupta SS. Prevalence of hypertension in a rural community of central India. Int J Biol Med Res 2011;2:950-3.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Subburam R, Sankarapandian M, Gopinath DR, Selvarajan SK, Kabilan L. Prevalence of hypertension and correlates among adults of 45-60 years in a rural area of Tamil Nadu. Indian J Public Health 2009;53:37-40.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]    
22.
Gupta R, Prakash H, Gupta VP, Gupta KD. Prevalence and determinants of coronary heart disease in a rural population of India. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:203-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Gilberts EC, Arnold MJ, Grobbee DE. Hypertension and determinants of blood pressure with special reference to socioeconomic status in a rural south Indian community. J Epidemiol Community Health 1994;48:258-61.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Dong GH, Sun ZQ, Zhang XZ, Li JJ, Zheng LQ, Li J, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment & control of hypertension in rural Liaoning province, China. Indian J Med Res 2008; 128:122-7.  Back to cited text no. 24
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
25.
Hazarika NC, Narain K, Biswas D, Kalita HC, Mahanta J. Hypertension in the native rural population of Assam. Natl Med J India 2004;17:300-4.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Malhotra P, Kumari S, Kumar R, Jain S, Sharma BK. Prevalence and determinants of hypertension in an un-industrialised rural population of North India. J Hum Hypertens 1999;13:467-72.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Mohan V, Deepa M, Farooq S, Datta M, Deepa R. Prevalence, awareness and control of hypertension in Chennai - The Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES-52). J Assoc Physicians India 2007;55:326-32.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Bansal SK, Saxena V, Kandpal SD, Gray WK, Walker RW, Goel D. The prevalence of hypertension and hypertension risk factors in a rural Indian community: A prospective door-to-door study. J Cardiovasc Dis Res 2012;3:117-23.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
29.
Gupta R, Gupta VP, Ahluwalia NS. Educational status, coronary heart disease, and coronary risk factor prevalence in a rural population of India. BMJ 1994;309:1332-6.  Back to cited text no. 29
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]


This article has been cited by
1 Comparing the ability of anthropometric indicators in determining the prevalence of hypertension among Indian tribes
Gautam K. Kshatriya,Anjali Kumari,Subhendu K. Acharya
Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews. 2019; 13(1): 696
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed6259    
    Printed38    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded332    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]