Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contact us Login 
  • Users Online:944
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 316-317

The sunburst sign


1 Department of Neurology, Pushpagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Thiruvalla, Kerala, India
2 Department of Neurology, Muthoot Hospital, Kozhencherry, Kerala, India

Date of Submission21-Oct-2020
Date of Decision15-Nov-2020
Date of Acceptance16-Nov-2020
Date of Web Publication23-Dec-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. S Sheetal
16 FG, The Edge, Skyline Apartments, Thirumoolapuram, Thiruvalla - 689 115, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/amhs.amhs_278_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Sheetal S, Thomas AG. The sunburst sign. Arch Med Health Sci 2020;8:316-7

How to cite this URL:
Sheetal S, Thomas AG. The sunburst sign. Arch Med Health Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 25];8:316-7. Available from: https://www.amhsjournal.org/text.asp?2020/8/2/316/304721



Sir,

A 74-year-old male with a history of Type 2 diabetes mellitus and systemic hypertension presented with the complaints of insidious-onset and gradually progressive memory impairment and slowness in walking for the past 3 months. He was noted to drag his left leg on walking. He denied any history of headache, vomiting, or seizures. On examination, he had evidence of frontal and temporal lobe dysfunction and spasticity of the left lower limb with left extensor plantar. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed a well-defined, extra-axial, dural-based, smoothly marginated, bi-lobed lesion, in the midline and parasagittal parieto-occipital region, straddling and mildly displacing the posterior falx toward the left side with invasion into the adjacent superior sagittal sinus [Figure 1]. Both the parasagittal components were seen displacing the adjacent brain parenchyma with an intervening cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cleft [Figure 1d]. The lesion was noted to exhibit homogeneous T1-weighted hypointense, T2/T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintense signal, with near-homogeneous postcontrast enhancement. Adjacent bilateral parieto-occipital dura and the posterior falx showed smooth thickening and increased enhancement, suggestive of dural tail sign [Figure 1d]. Radial sunburst pattern was noted in the lesion on T2-weighted and postcontrast images, more prominent in the right-sided component [Figure 1]. All these features were suggestive of meningioma. He was referred for surgery.
Figure 1: (a-c) Contrast-enhanced T1 sequences, axial, coronal, and sagittal sections, respectively, showing a dural-based, bi-lobed, homogenously enhancing lesion in the midline and parasagittal parieto-occipital region, right more than left, with a radial sunburst pattern (arrows). (d-f) Axial, coronal, and sagittal T2-weighted images showing the hyperintense bi-lobed lesion displacing the adjacent brain parenchyma with an intervening cerebrospinal fluid cleft (d, yellow arrow) and demonstrating the radial sunburst sign

Click here to view


Meningiomas are the most common dural tumors.[1] On computed tomography imaging, majority of meningiomas are hyperdense to the cortex and may show intratumoral calcification. Meningiomas are usually isointense to the cortex on all MRI sequences, however T2 hyperintensity may be seen in 50% of the cases, due to hypervascularity.[1] They do not usually demonstrate diffusion restriction, and more than 50% cause perilesional vasogenic edema.[1] A CSF cleft may be seen between the tumor body and the brain parenchyma.[2] Most meningiomas demonstrate strong enhancement on postcontrast imaging and a dural tail sign is seen in up to 72% of cases, due to reactive thickening and enhancement of the dura.[3] Dural metastatic lesions are typically hyperintense on T2 sequence, whereas lymphoma is typically isointense to hypointense in T2-weighted sequence. Other meningioma mimics include solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) and melanoma, nonneoplastic processes such as tuberculosis and sarcoidosis, and autoimmune diseases such as immunoglobulin G4-related disease.[1] The sunburst sign or spoke wheel appearance is a radiological sign seen in meningiomas.[1],[4] The sunburst sign refers to the characteristic vascular supply seen in some meningiomas, when seen tangential to the dural attachment. Dural branches of the external carotid artery, internal carotid artery, and vertebral artery may supply the tumor, and pial arteries may also become parasitized by the tumor. The feeder arterial branches diverge radially into the lesion, distributed like sunrays, giving the appearance of a sunburst on T2-weighted or postcontrast images, or during angiography.[5] Low-grade SFTs, which mimic meningioma, may have “fluffy” contrast enhancement rather than a sunburst sign.[1] Flow voids, described as absence of signal on MR images, caused by blood or cerebral spinal fluid flow, are seen in meningiomas and SFTs. Intracranial SFTs on MR images are reported to show a serpentine flow void, however a sunburst flow void is reported to be typical of meningioma.[4] Meningeal hemangiopericytomas are aggressive versions of SFTs of the dura, and they also show multiple flow voids on MRI and a fluffy staining on angiography. On magnetic resonance spectroscopy, meningiomas exhibit high choline: creatinine ratio and low N-Acetyl Aspartate (NAA) peak. Alanine peak, if present, is characteristic. Meningiomas have many characteristic imaging features, one of which is the sunburst sign, which helps in differentiating from other dural-based pathologies.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Lyndon D, Lansley JA, Evanson J, Krishnan AS. Dural masses: Meningiomas and their mimics. Insights Imaging 2019;10:11.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Buetow MP, Buetow PC, Smirniotopoulos JG. Typical, atypical, and misleading features in meningioma. Radiographics 1991;11:1087-106.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Tokumaru A, O'uchi T, Eguchi T, Kawamoto S, Kokubo T, Suzuki M, et al. Prominent meningeal enhancement adjacent to meningioma on Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR images: Histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1990;175:431-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Wang C, Xu Y, Xiao X, Zhang J, Zhou F, Zhao X. Role of intratumoral flow void signs in the differential diagnosis of intracranial solitary fibrous tumors and meningiomas. J Neuroradiol 2016;43:325-30.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kunimatsu A, Kunimatsu N, Kamiya K, Katsura M, Mori H, Ohtomo K. Variants of meningiomas: A review of imaging findings and clinical features. Jpn J Radiol 2016;34:459-69.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed76    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded14    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]